Differentiation Part4
Contents |
Parametric Functions
Remember that parametric functions will be in the form
Notice that normally, when we have
, we can find
Imagine we have
, we can find
Thus, since we have
, we can find
But how would be find
?
Remember that chain rule give us
Since we already have
However notice that we have can find
Thus we can use the law either as
- Or directly as
However, if we have fraction for
, it's better we just multiply the reciprocal (rather than divide by a fraction)
- if
- if
- if
,
Note:
- Keep in mind you final answer will be in terms
or whatever the parameter is
- Don't mix up your
's and your
's
- If you are not sure which divide by which (for example, during exam), simply write out the chain rule and work it out
- Be extra careful (and check) when you have fractions for the
and/or
Quick Practice:
Beyond that, there isn't really anything new you need to learn here. However, the following examples and exercises WILL serve as a very good practice of identifying what kind of rules we will use to get the individual derivatives , since there are all mixed up here compared to previous exercises.
Examples
Exercise 7
Find
for the following
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
- k)
Implicit Functions
Up to now, we have dealt with functions which is given in the form of
, which are explicit functions.
- Examples :
Implicit functions are simply functions/relations NOT written explicitly in the form of
.
- Examples :
Note :
- It is normally (but not always) difficult/impossible to rearrange the given implicit functions/relations to the explicit form (so don't waste your time)
- There are however certain times we would instead change an explicit function to the implicit function to make the differentiation easier.
- The derivative of the implicit function will be in terms of both
and
. This is perfectly acceptable if the question was given in the implicit form, unless they ask us to change it back to in terms of
only, or the question was actually in explicit form but we used implicit.
Derivative of f(y)
- If have
, we can find
- If we have
however, we can only find
In other words
Once again
Examples
Products/Quotients
As before, basically, just remember that products/quotients takes precedence (as in we apply the products/quotients formulas first before anything else). In fact, there is nothing new to learn here, just a practice of sticking to the formulas even when things get very complicated (and as always, learning how to check to make sure we didn't miss out anything)
Let's try
Examples
Differentiate the following w.r.t.
. Hence. find
Exercise 8
Differentiate the following with respect to
. Hence, find
.
a)
b)
c)
d)
- e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
Derivatives using logarithm
Prove of
Note: Alternatively, we can prove this formula using the identity
and
Notice that the method works because logarihms allows us to bring down the index to make the differentiating much easier. Additionally, we can also use it to change times/divide to plus/minus.
Thus, we can use this method to as alternative method to solve questions with difficult index, such as
(actually, the differentiation itself isn't that difficult even if we use the normal method, but the simplifying after that can be tricky)
Note:
- Remember to ln BOTH sides
- Remember the
- Remember to change the final answer back to
only
Example
Using logarithm, or otherwise, differentiate
w.r.t.
Alternatively,
Exercise 9
Using logarithm, or otherwise, find
for the following.
a)
OR
b)
OR
Higher Derivatives
If we differentiate
w.r.t.
, what do we get?
- Note :
If we keep on differentiation, the notation will be as follows
Example
Proving Differential Equations
These are a special type of question whereby we are given a function, and instead of finding the actual formula for its derivative(s), we are asked to prove that the function satisfies a given differential equation.
Example : If
, where
are constants, prove that
- Notice that :
- We are NOT required to actually find the formula of the derivatives (in terms of
anyway)
- The final equation doesn't have most of the terms in the original function
- One might say, why not just differentiate it twice, and plug it into the L.H.S and prove it to be zero? Trust me when I say it's not going to work, not just because it might not get accepted (I am not sure), but because it will be so complicated that you will most likely make many careless mistake and waste a lot of time.
- We are NOT required to actually find the formula of the derivatives (in terms of
General Guidelines :
Each question, is of course, different. But always keep the following two tips in mind when attempting this kind of question
- If needed, rearrange the equation BEFORE differentiating.
- This doesn't only apply to the first step, but also before you differentiate it a second time. Since we are not interested in keeping the derivative in terms of
only, we have more freedom here compared to usual. We can bring over terms by multiplying, square both sides, etc.
- This doesn't only apply to the first step, but also before you differentiate it a second time. Since we are not interested in keeping the derivative in terms of
- Always simplify if possible BEFORE differentiating it a second time.
- "Simplify" here carry a different meaning than usual. As most of the time the final equation contains a lot of
's (
), it will mean we try to "simplify" it so that it contains those terms, rather than complicated terms in
- "Simplify" here carry a different meaning than usual. As most of the time the final equation contains a lot of
Examples
- If
, where
are constants, prove that
- If
, prove that
- If
, prove that
- If
, prove that
Exercise 10
1)If
, prove that
2)If
, prove that
3)If
, prove that
4)If
, prove that
5)If
, where
are constants, prove that




(We don't need to prove why)

























while 













are 


























directly.
directly. So how would we find ![=\frac{d\left[f\left({\color{Blue}y}\right)\right]}{?}\times\frac{?}{d{\color{Red}x}}](/images/math/6/d/e/6dec52876f0f2bc14c33ace498f66ba1.png)
![=\frac{d\left[f\left({\color{Blue}y}\right)\right]}{{\color{Blue}dy}}\times\frac{{\color{Blue}dy}}{d{\color{Red}x}}](/images/math/3/9/c/39c52b11019ff480f518dc51c8c64392.png)
"normally", as you would differentiate
, AND THEN![\frac{d\left[f\left(y\right)\right]}{dx}](/images/math/c/7/7/c779ea8ff9b6b7854a9b5d2c72688e58.png)
![=\frac{d\left[f\left(y\right)\right]}{dy}\times\frac{dy}{dx}](/images/math/b/7/3/b7336c13f03d4576e93df4062db21cd4.png)








(Don't forget the 









































. Did you miss out any 





. We































, how do we solve it?
(cause we know derivative of 

is a constant)


![\ln y=\ln \left[\frac{3x-2}{\sqrt[3]{x+1}}\right]](/images/math/b/b/4/bb466992600f044ce7422763cee4718c.png)







![\frac{dy}{dx}=\left(\frac{3x-2}{\sqrt[3]{x+1}}\right)\frac{6x+11}{3\left(3x-2\right)\left(x+1\right)}](/images/math/3/1/f/31f4ab7320b2fdefdb7b887838d2dd16.png)

![\begin{align}
y&=\frac{3x-2}{\sqrt[3]{x+1}}\\
\frac{dy}{dx}&=\frac{\left(x+1\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}\cdot3-\left(3x-2\right)\cdot\frac{1}{3}\left(x+1\right)^{-\frac{2}{3}}}{\left(x+1\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}}\\
&=\frac{\left(x+1\right)^{-\frac{2}{3}}\left[9\left(x+1\right)-\left(3x-2\right)\right]}{3\left(x+1\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}}\\
&=\frac{6x+11}{3\left(x+1\right)^{\frac{4}{3}}}\\
\end{align}](/images/math/6/6/4/66466c89eb40e571bf5d8fc37bf3e47c.png)

![\begin{align}
&y=\sqrt[4]{3x-1}\left(2x-3\right)\\
&\ln y= \ln \left[ \sqrt[4]{3x-1}\left(2x-3\right)\right]\\
&\ln y= \frac{1}{4}\ln\left(3x-1\right)+\ln \left(2x-3\right)\\
&\frac{1}{y}\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{3}{4\left(3x-1\right)}+\frac{2}{\left(2x-3\right)}\\
&\frac{1}{y}\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{3\left(2x-3\right)+8\left(3x-1\right)}{4\left(3x-1\right)\left(2x-3\right)}\\
&\frac{1}{y}\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{30x-17}{4\left(3x-1\right)\left(2x-3\right)}\\
&\frac{dy}{dx}= y\left[\frac{30x-17}{4\left(3x-1\right)\left(2x-3\right)}\right]\\
&\frac{dy}{dx}= \sqrt[4]{3x-1}\left(2x-3\right)\left[\frac{30x-17}{4\left(3x-1\right)\left(2x-3\right)}\right]\\
&\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{30x-17}{4\left(3x-1\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}}\\
\end{align}](/images/math/7/c/2/7c2f0b37b679ccc2e22d2ee352b699e0.png)
![\begin{align}
y&=\sqrt[4]{3x-1}\left(2x-3\right)\\
\frac{dy}{dx}&=\left(3x-1\right)^{\frac{1}{4}}\cdot2+\left(2x-3\right)\cdot\frac{1}{4}\left(3x-1\right)^{-\frac{3}{4}}\left(3\right)\\
&=\frac{1}{4}\left(3x-1\right)^{-\frac{3}{4}}\left[8\left(3x-1\right)+3\left(2x-3\right) \right]\\
&=\frac{30x-17}{4\left(3x-1\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}}\\
\end{align}](/images/math/4/2/9/42941c84a99fc4ead245ddbd9a0693bf.png)

![\begin{align}
&y=\frac{\left(x-1\right)^{4}}{\sqrt[3]{x+1}}\\
&\ln y= \ln \left[\frac{\left(x-1\right)^{4}}{\sqrt[3]{x+1}}\right]\\
&\ln y= 4\ln\left(x-1\right)-\frac{1}{3}\ln \left(x+1\right)\\
&\frac{1}{y}\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{4}{\left(x-1\right)}-\frac{1}{3\left(x+1\right)}\\
&\frac{1}{y}\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{12\left(x+1\right)-\left(x-1\right)}{3\left(x-1\right)\left(x+1\right)}\\
&\frac{1}{y}\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{11x+13}{3\left(x-1\right)\left(x+1\right)}\\
&\frac{dy}{dx}= y\left[\frac{11x+13}{3\left(x-1\right)\left(x+1\right)}\right]\\
&\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{\left(x-1\right)^{4}}{\sqrt[3]{x+1}}\left[\frac{11x+13}{3\left(x-1\right)\left(x+1\right)}\right]\\
&\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{\left(11x+13\right)\left(x-1\right)^{3}}{3\left(x+1\right)^{\frac{4}{3}}}\\
\end{align}](/images/math/2/2/1/221491d07655aa0d76619bac7c164aec.png)
![\begin{align}
y&=\frac{\left(x-1\right)^{4}}{\sqrt[3]{x+1}}\\
\frac{dy}{dx}&=\frac{\left(x+1\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}\cdot4\left(x-1\right)^{3}-\left(x-1\right)^{4}\cdot\frac{1}{3}\left(x+1\right)^{-\frac{2}{3}}}{\left(x+1\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}}\\
\frac{dy}{dx}&=\frac{\left(x+1\right)^{-\frac{2}{3}}\left(x-1\right)^{3}\left[12\left(x+1\right)-\left(x-1\right)\right]}{3\left(x+1\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}}\\
\frac{dy}{dx}&= \frac{\left(11x+13\right)\left(x-1\right)^{3}}{3\left(x+1\right)^{\frac{4}{3}}}\\
\end{align}](/images/math/a/0/5/a059f1059be0014193fc0f8ecc275e24.png)









already has its own meaning. Instead we use 





, meaning 
. Differentiating that a second time will make the R.H.S even more complicated with
See something?




. Forcing our way will only end up with something much more complicated.
See it?

, which seems complicated at first, but remember we need to substitute away 



to the other side. Note that since
, both as easy to differentiate.




























![e^{-2x}\left[\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}-2\frac{dy}{dx}-2\left(\frac{dy}{dx}-2y\right)\right]=-9\sin 3x](/images/math/2/3/1/2318446439a43736e1eb257985bfc403.png)















does NOT help in this type of question)
which will make things very complicated and hard to simplify back to the wanted equation.
, we can see that though it is not simple, but at least less complicated than the quotient (not having the
makes A LOT of difference here)






or
anyway. The working thus far
. But that would mean we need to rearrange the equation so that it will have 









![\begin{align}
&ye^{mx}=a\cos px\qquad\frac{\qquad\qquad}{}\left(1\right)\\
&\mbox{Diff. w.r.t.}\;x :\\
&yme^{mx}+e^{mx}\frac{dy}{dx}=-ap\sin px\\
&e^{mx}\left(my+\frac{dy}{dx}\right)=-ap\sin px\\
&\mbox{Diff. w.r.t.}\;x :\\
&e^{mx}\left(m\frac{dy}{dx}+\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}\right)+\left(my+\frac{dy}{dx}\right)me^{mx}=-ap^{2}\cos px\\
&e^{mx}\left(m\frac{dy}{dx}+\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}+m^{2}y+m\frac{dy}{dx}\right)=-ap^{2}\cos px\\
&e^{mx}\left(\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}+2m\frac{dy}{dx}+m^{2}y\right)=-p^{2}\left(a\cos px\right)\qquad\frac{\qquad\qquad}{}\left(2\right)\\
&\left(1\right)\rightarrow \left(2\right):e^{mx}\left(\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}+2m\frac{dy}{dx}+m^{2}y\right)=-p^{2}\left(ye^{mx}\right)\\
&e^{mx}\left[\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}+2m\frac{dy}{dx}+\left( m^{2}+p^{2}\right)y\right]=0\\
&\mbox{Since}\;e^{mx}>0, \therefore \frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}+2m\frac{dx}{dy}+\left(m^{2}+p^{2}\right)y=0\qquad\frac{\qquad\qquad}{}\mbox{Proved}
\end{align}](/images/math/3/f/9/3f9c5495dc3ddb31c64ae01d6c4725b9.png)